Mistral Code agent API pricing

What it costs on a real workload

Per 1M tokens processed, at the rates above. How the four profiles are defined.

Compare every model on these profiles →

Observed rate history

Dates are when we observed the rate in our own snapshots, which can lag the provider's announcement. Rates per 1M tokens.

What the record shows

We have observed one change to Mistral Code agent's rates since it entered our archive on 2026-08-30. The most recent, on 2026-09-19, left the output rate unchanged.

Against the 40 models we price, it is the 16th cheapest for retrieval-shaped work, which reads a great deal and writes little, and the 17th cheapest for content-shaped work, which does the reverse. The two are close, so it holds its position whichever way your workload leans.

It charges 5.0 times more for output than for input, against a median of 5.0 times across the set. That is close to typical for the models we track.

Inside Mistral's own lineup it is the 8th cheapest of the 9 models we track on this workload, so 7 cheaper and 1 more expensive option sits on the same account behind the same key.

28 of the 40 models we price offer a larger context window, and 2 match it exactly. Context is a capability limit rather than a cost one: paying more buys no extra room unless the larger window is what you are paying for.

Cached input reads at $0.040 against a standard input rate of $0.400, a 90% discount on the part of your prompt that repeats.

Whether it accepts image input is not stated in the source we capture, and we do not guess at it.

Its 256k token context window holds roughly 192,000 words of English text in a single request. A workload that does not fit cannot run here at any price, which is a capability limit rather than a cost one.

Priced near this one

Closest to Mistral Code agent on a retrieval workload, cheaper and more expensive alike. Cost only; we publish no quality score.

Retrieval profile: 800k in, 200k out, 70% cached where offered.