Gemini 3.7 Flash API pricing

What it costs on a real workload

Per 1M tokens processed, at the rates above. How the four profiles are defined.

Compare every model on these profiles →

Observed rate history

No repricing observed since this model entered our archive on 2026-08-14. When a rate moves, the change appears here and on the sitewide ticker.

What the record shows

Gemini 3.7 Flash has not repriced once since it entered our archive on 2026-08-14. That is the ordinary case rather than the exception: providers ship new models at lower rates far more often than they cut the price of one already in service, which is why a cheaper option usually arrives as a new name rather than as a smaller number on this page.

Against the 43 models we price, it is the 22nd cheapest for retrieval-shaped work, which reads a great deal and writes little, and the 23rd cheapest for content-shaped work, which does the reverse. The two are close, so it holds its position whichever way your workload leans.

It charges 5.0 times more for output than for input, against a median of 5.0 times across the set. That is close to typical for the models we track.

Cached input reads at $0.075 against a standard input rate of $0.750, a 90% discount on the part of your prompt that repeats.

It accepts image input and Google publishes a tokenisation rule for it, so a scanned page can be priced honestly: about 1,032 tokens for a US Letter page at 200 DPI, before the instructions you send with it.

Its 1.05M token context window holds roughly 786,000 words of English text in a single request, or about 1,016 scanned pages at the per-page figure above. A workload that does not fit cannot run here at any price, which is a capability limit rather than a cost one.

Priced near this one

Closest to Gemini 3.7 Flash on a retrieval workload, cheaper and more expensive alike. Cost only; we publish no quality score.

Retrieval profile: 800k in, 200k out, 70% cached where offered.